What is bwv bach

Among his best known cantatas are:. In addition, Bach wrote a number of secular cantatas, usually for civic events such as council inaugurations. Several of them were composed for funerals.

Bach assembled his last large work, the Mass in B minor, near the end of his life, between and He incorporated the Sanctus of and the Missa in B minor, composed in He derived many movements from his cantatas, such as Weinen, Klagen, Sorgen, Zagen , BWV 12 , written in , and composed some new movements. All of these movements have substantial solo parts as well as choruses. It is not known what direction of development Bach had intended for his last Mass to take.

As Stauffer states,. If Bach had lived longer, it is likely that he would have created a definitive fair copy of the Mass, similar to those of the St. John and St. It contains the letters J S B superimposed over their mirror image topped with a crown. During the Baroque period, many composers only wrote the framework, and performers embellished this framework with ornaments and other elaboration.

This practice varied considerably between the schools of European music; Bach notated most or all of the details of his melodic lines, leaving little for performers to interpolate. This accounted for his control over the dense contrapuntal textures that he favored, and decreased leeway for spontaneous variation of musical lines. At the same time, Bach left the instrumentation of major works including The Art of Fugue open. He wrote more cogent, tightly integrated chorale preludes than most.

I'd love to see and help out on that. The Sinfonia from cantata BWV 21 also has a nice part for oboe. At the top of my list would be the Casals lead performance of BWV a reconstructed concerto for violin and oboe.

A friend on another list recently told me about this recording and the adagio, clocking in at what must be a record slow pace of , has become one of my all-time favourite pieces of music.

For me, an incredible moving work. Isaac Stern plays the violin and Marcel Tabuteau plays the oboe. In the oboe and violin form the work sounds very much like a wordless duet between human singers.

Once again, thanks for your help, PS: I hope I'm not telling you folks something everybody out there already knows, but I just found a great site that does the best it can at listing the cantatas in chronological order. Following our list of discussion every week you will bathe in Bach for the next three years!

His music will always be on your mind. Unexpectedly it will pop up and comment your life situations in words and music. You will never be tired of studying gems from this treasure box. A cantata a day keeps the shrink away! PS Welcome to the list. I look forward to read your contributions! I've found this to be true. I've come to love working Bach into my conversations, my home, my car, my work.

His music does add radiance in my life. I hope this doesn't sound too fuzzy-headed, but I find my mind breaths easier when I listen to Bach. Brushing close to such a genius makes me feel better. I listen to Bach to encounter greatness. Thanks for the list of recommendations. I should probably come out right now on the list and say I'm all for different types of performances of Bach's work.

I make a point to try to accept what the conductors and performers are trying to do and relax and see where they can emotionally move me to. Sometimes when I'm in the mood, I like Rifkin's light-footed, deeply textured cantatas. But at other times when I'm in the mood to hear a glorious surging wall of beauty, I play Gardiner's version of the Mass. See above. I agree. Thanks for the welcome.

Rifkin and Gould also share interests in modern music, both made early significant piano recordings of overlooked music for Rifkin it was Joplin's music, for Gould the famous 55 Goldbergs as well as having championed controversial performances of Bach which downplay the overly dramatic gestures in favour of smaller scale dynamics that allow for a better presentation of the contrapuntal aspects of Bach's compositions.

Of course, they part ways in that Rifkin defends his method on historical grounds and Gould was simply out to make music however he wanted. Just my thoughts on the issue which I would love to discuss more with anyone. Looking forward to learning more about the cantatas from you. Jim Morrison wrote October 15, : I'm sorry if I'm being too much of the new guy on the list and flooding you with emails, but I think I need to clarify something from a post I just made.

I certainly have preferences for specific recordings, and some performances of Bach's music I can't stand. I simply try, but sometimes fail, to tone down those strong negative opinions down when discussing the works.

Different musicians on different days have different aspects of the music they want to emphasis and I think much is gained by trying to listen to the recordings on their own terms, by what they want to offer us. I've found that my tastes change and works that I thought I'd never listen to again get into regular rotation on my CD player. I'm listening to Prohaska's version of 'Jesu, der du meine Seele' BWV 78 right now and I expected to enjoy it more than I am though I do like it , considering the high recommendations I've seen of it.

But my on personal tastes are clearly more sympathetic with Rifkin's concept of the cantata, esp. I think the big organ sound is given too much prominence in the Prohaska recording and that Rifkin makes a great decision to bring the string playing up in the mix and to employ a less imposing organ.

What does this have to do with BWV ? Sorry, I don't have that cantata. I think you can tell I'd be talking about it if I did. In most cases, it is capitalized with no punctuation between. However, I have seen instances where the acronym is simply bwv lowercase. What is the universally accepted method or more importantly, what is the scholarly method?

Thanks for your help. You can respond privately, and I will post a list of pertinent responses. JaJean wrote January 31, : To Patrick Pope Don't know about scholarly, but since all three words are capitalized, I guess the correct abbreviation should be uppercase too. That's the way it appears more often and the closer you'll get to universally accepted. This abbreviation is now obsolete. Daniel E. What ever else you have come across is absolutely incorrect. Kevin Sutton wrote February 2, : To Patrick Pope It isn't a matter of being scholarly, rather it is a question of grammatically correct German.

There are no periods in German abbreviations, and the letters are all capitalized because they all represent nouns, which are always capitalized in written German. BWV Means…? Kevin M. Quinley weote January 12, : This may be a very basic question, but what does BWV mean when appended or referenced to a piece of Bach music? Who assigns these numbers and what is their significance?

Quinley] This may be a very basic question, Basic questions are often answered in a FAQ, a list of frequently asked questions. Like the Fanno Fanna? Ricordi, Schmieder was compiling a "guide" to the BGA. There was so little research in Bach chronology back in , a chronological ordering was impossible, although Schimieder attempts a chronologucal table. Back then Canata BWV 4 Christ lag inTodesbanden was considered a late cantata, whereas we now know it to be an early one.

Poor Schmieder, if he'd changed his name to Zchmieder, we'd all refer to Z numbers. You cannot say there was little research in Bach chronology before Philipp Spitta in his 2 volume biography appeared somewhere and is still in print researched all Bach cantata manuscripts.

No doubt Schmieder just used the dates by Spitta. During WW-II the manuscripts from the Amalienbibliothek were divided in two halves and moved to a safe location outside Berlin. After the war one location appeared to be in the Western zones, and one in the Soviet-zone. The Western part ended up in Tuebingen, the Soviet part returned to Berlin, Hauptstadt der DDR Because of this musicologists were forced to completely recatalogue and sort out all those manuscripts.

Doing so, Spitta was found to be wrong on several basic grounds - He didn't differentiate between watermarks on the recto and the verso side of the paper. Explore Wikis Community Central.

Register Don't have an account? Edit source History Talk 0. Categories Add category. Cancel Save.